![]() ![]() In India, police physically assaulted 10 journalists who reported that a COVID-19 roadblock in the southeast was preventing villagers from reuniting with their families. Youths in the Philippines were locked in dog cages following curfew violations, says Ms. Enforcement of those measures could be harsh. “What’s interesting about the current situation, and particularly prior to the development of the vaccines – when all countries basically have the very same rudimentary toolkit of these NPIs, these nonpharmaceutical interventions – was basically, How willing were people to go along with these restrictions? What were they willing to sacrifice and what were they not willing to sacrifice?”Ĭan a Democrat win over rural Ohio? Tim Ryan gives it a shot.Īccording to Human Rights Watch, 83 governments restricted free speech and free assembly in the name of pandemic protections. Are they complements or substitutes?” says Marcella Alsan, professor of public policy at Harvard Kennedy School, who studies public health and infectious diseases. “That tension is long-standing, liberty versus security. The balance between compulsion and cooperation may shape the response to future public emergencies. At issue is whether governments bolstered a sense of partnership with their citizens or squandered trust. Others bypassed privacy in favor of track-and-trace measures and digital surveillance of those under quarantine.įor many citizens, sacrificing civil liberties was a necessary and worthwhile trade-off in the bid to “flatten the curve.” Now, civil libertarians are assessing the short-term and long-term ramifications of often unprecedented steps. Some countries cracked down on speech and press freedoms. ![]() Freedom of movement was hemmed in by various rules for curfews, travel, and public and private assembly. The wide spectrum of measures varied from country to country – and often within different jurisdictions within nations. “It was neither necessary nor proportionate to arrest her in that fashion.”įrom Australia to Zimbabwe, almost every nation in the world enacted restrictions during the pandemic. ![]() “During the time of the pandemic, obviously the state can take certain measures to restrict civil liberties, but it’s very important that those measures are necessary, lawful, and proportionate,” says Elaine Pearson, the Australia director at Human Rights Watch, based in Sydney. But is it possible to act collectively and maintain individual rights? Worldwide, citizens have given up civil liberties in order to fight the pandemic. was basically, How willing were people to go along with these restrictions? What were they willing to sacrifice and what were they not willing to sacrifice?” “What’s interesting about the current situation, and particularly prior to the development of the vaccines. Are they complements or substitutes?” says Marcella Alsan, professor of public policy at Harvard Kennedy School. Others bypassed privacy in favor of track-and-trace measures and digital surveillance of those under quarantine.įor many citizens, sacrificing civil liberties was a necessary and worthwhile trade-off in the bid to “flatten the curve.” Now, civil libertarians are assessing the short- and long-term ramifications of often unprecedented steps. From Australia to Zimbabwe, almost every nation in the world enacted restrictions during the pandemic. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |